GAY DOMAIN: Dueling Dot-Coms Battle for Dot-Gay

Filed under: NEWS — transracial @ 8:27 am August 26, 2009

rainbowmap

A pair of start-up companies have recently begun working to promote — and ultimately secure — the new domain name “.gay”.

Much like “.com” or “.org” — “.gay” would appear at the end of web-sites wishing to appeal to or advertise their connection to the GLBT community. Businesses, non-profits, GLBT blogs and other websites with Gay links could use the “.gay” suffix to conspicuously promote their homo bona fides.

It’s an interesting proposition. And like anything that deals with Gay rights, media or money, the .gay campaign is already resulting in rival entities hoping to dominate the domain discourse — and potentially make millions of dollars in the process.

In New York, Bonnie Fuller-survivor and former Details and Star magazine editor Joe Dolce has launched the DotGayAlliance — which debuted early this month to help get the .gay domain name registered with ICANN — the International Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers.

ICANN is the Internet entity which oversees and manages Top-level Domains (TLD) such as .com, .eu, .net, etc. Last year ICANN announced a new program to allow the use of a potentially infinite number of TLD — up from the current 21. This program will launch next year — and .gay would be one of these new TLDs.

Dolce’s group sees the ascent of .gay as an organic step in the battle for GLBT rights that began with the Stonewall Riots 40 years ago, continued with the fight for AIDS funding/survival via ACT-UP and is now anchored around civil rights and mainstream visibility. “The .GAY top-level domain,” Dolce’s group says, “will provide concentrated Internet real estate for companies to showcase their gay efforts.”

Dolce says his group’s business model is based on the plan behind the Al Gore-backed “.eco” registration campaign. And 51 percent of its profits will be earmarked for GLBT charities worldwide.

In California, meanwhile, dotGAY debuted in June — a three-years-in-the-making effort by Berlin-born/Europe-based Alexander Schubert, who has worked for years in the domain-naming industry.

Schubert is actually hetero — which makes you wonder how/why he has a Castro Street address on his business card.

Anyway, Schubert’s goal is similar to Dolce’s — achieve formal .gay approval via ICANN and help it become the TLD-of-choice for GLBT businesses and groups.

dotGAY, too, says it will have a philanthropic component — initially pegged at 50 percent of profits, but soon to be more generously revised (note Dolce’s 51 percent profit donation promise).

Of course with folks having to pay for .gay’s use, money and profit are certainly potential issues here. Especially considering both Dolce and Schubert’s groups will have to shell out $185,000 to simply to apply for ICANN-approval.  And this is just the beginning. Schubert says running the .gay organization could actually cost upwards of $500,000 with operations costs factored in.

Which leads to the following question — why two separate groups essentially advocating for the exact same goal via the exact same process?  Because ICANN will ultimately award .gay to only ONE company — Dolce’s DotGayAlliance, Schubert’s dotGAY, or perhaps another future arrival.

Whoever controls .gay will then be able to sell the domain on to folks wishing to use it for their website.  And with .gay far more recognizable and brandable than, say, .eco, or .travel — the potential .gay market could be huge.

The porn possibilities alone could be massive! Even a random domain like “.info” has over 5 million users.

And interestingly, a similar battle is actually brewing between Al Gore and former Soviet Premier Mikhail Gorbachev over the fate of the equally-lucrative “.eco” domain — with each backing rival registration companies much like Dolce and Schubert for .gay.

The final ICANN decision won’t come until mid-2010.  Schubert suspects .gay could ultimately wind-up sold via auction — with the price tag reaching into the millions. Which is why both groups are right now clearly clamoring for investors.

A sexy, seven-figure .gay sale would certainly make for good media fodder. But it would also mean .gay’s eventual owner would have to spend years toiling to recoup that investment — which would long delay those profits promised to charities.

We suspect the .gay battle is just beginning — and with those millions of dollars at stake, it could get fierce!

8 Comments »

  • [...] Artículo original: Transracial [...]

    Pingback by Lo que viene: Las direcciones gay “.gay” | Gorila Blog — August 28, 2009 @ 2:09 pm

  • “Schubert is actually hetero — which makes you wonder how/why he has a Castro Street address on his business card.”

    Yeah.. it’s inconceivable that someone who isn’t gay would have an office on Castro Street. Isn’t there a law or something?

    Comment by Brad — August 28, 2009 @ 2:49 pm

  • what we mean is that there is something slightly cynical about using a castro street addreess in SF when one can presume he is only there for the street cred

    Comment by transracial — August 28, 2009 @ 4:29 pm

  • My concern would be that by separating everyone into their own parent domains would make it censorship that much easier. Countries could easily block the whole .gay parent domain and cut off access to millions of people. I’m happy keeping my gay organization as a .org.

    Comment by DanO — August 28, 2009 @ 8:12 pm

  • It would make it easy to block a whole TLD – making a kind of cyber-ghetto.

    Comment by Bill MacKay — August 28, 2009 @ 8:21 pm

  • This is absolutely a BAD idea and not just a ghetto, but a concentration camp–especially because there are no gay businesses directly profiting. If dot gay is a domain, internet filters will more easily screen out websites–like some of them already do with the word “gay.” However, “homosexual” will not be screened out, because that is the language of the oppressor. This is b.s. attempt to corral free speech and lay the groundwork for persecution and censorship.

    Comment by LC — August 30, 2009 @ 12:49 pm

  • i think the idea is that companies could somehow benefit
    i guess we will just have to wait and see how it all turns out

    Comment by transracial — August 30, 2009 @ 1:32 pm

  • [...] here at Transracial, we kinda/sorta broke the whole story with THIS lengthy report way back on August [...]

    Pingback by TRANSRACIAL » GLOBAL DOMAIN: International Internet Board Approves Polyglot Web-Addresses — October 30, 2009 @ 7:31 am

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment